Lenny Henry swaps comedy for Shakespeare – http://tinyurl.com/aqbavk
@michaeljung Obama’s team is buying goodwill. From there, as people sit at the table solutions will be found. This puts to shame nay sayers
@michaeljung Sure people say things. Leadership is vital, it’s clear who could provide it. Poor attitude is what breeds negativity, I think
I don’t believe in miracles, Obama is no messiah. But he’s already helping. People will start seeking/expecting Leadership from America
Tony Blair communicated well, while Obama connects well. Leadership 101, bound to deliver more positive than not. I buy that.
Watching Obama on Tv. He sounds so genuine that I feel my (normally tough) natural caution is being tested here.
Back to blogging again, after a long hiatus and not Twitter’s fault
Finally, I’ve moved my little blog around from Lycos.nl. Last year I had no time or taste for blogging at all. After letting myself be tempted by tweeting, I found the energy to get back to blogging. If you are (or have been) following thanks for hanging in there, it’s going to be much more useful, thought provoking and even some media experimentation stuff.
I guess I now feel the need to actually post stuff instead of just pretending to. This blog was only ever about finding out how hard it could be to keep one up, using the lessons learned to inform and help clients professionally. It’s gone well beyong that remit and have taken various shapes. Now it’s evolving again and I suspect in a more useful way.
Today, computers and the Information Technology rule huge amount of our daily lives yet they are wide open to the most ridiculous misdemeanours, mostly with no consequence to the culprits. How did it come to this? If unckecked, often that is, nearly anybody can claim to be an IT expert and cause untold damages to organisations and their clients and customers? The basic safeguards are either not in place or they are desperately inadequate. Why is it so? Why didn’t the automobile and aviation (who’ve also known huge growth in relatively short timeframes) know similar “laisser-faire”?
It’s a good thing that we can learn from our forefathers’ legacies. It’s good that we can experience the world in our own way – some will rightly dispute the term “our forefathers”. This way we can enrich ourselves and our communities, discover new things (“new” in this context only applies to the discoverer and some part of his/her community). Nearly every discipline in our body of knowledge and society have known a select group of influential contributors, some of these have single-handedly driven things forward. These pioneers’ and geniuses’ acts and thoughts in some cases took the entire mankind to new places, always with the duality of good/bad aspects and consequences.
People have quickly learned that some experiments and explorations are best kept within bounds. If nothing else we realised that we could get hurt or others (we care about) could also get hurt. Every time we reached such epiphany we came up with elaborate principles, ways of behaving and means of communicating for preserving self- and preserving loved-ones. Examples abound, we have rules and regulations to deal with all aspects of society, we have codes of conduct, we have traffic rules, we have laws, we have regulatory bodies, and so on and so forth. This can be collectively called “civilisation”, for the lack of a better term. Thank goodness we can now walk up and down city streets, buy food, enter and exit buildings, get on planes, trains, cars, go places, all of this with reasonable assurance that we will get through the experience unharmed and we can repeat the feat again and again.